Ben Franklin cautioned that neglect may breed great mischief when he wrote; ” for want of a nail the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost, and for want of a horse the rider was lost,” being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for want of care about a horse-shoe nail.

Franklin’s wisdom has held true throughout the centuries. Tie his wisdom together with the warning by George Santayana’s caution that “Those who fail to learn from history are domed to REPEAT IT” – and you have a recipe for disaster when an entire nation chooses ignorance folly and evil over prudence and wisdom and goodness.

THIS IS the situation that Americans have allowed themselves to be PURPOSEFULLY deceived distracted deluded and dumbed down by the cunning of the jew. For those whose atrophied brains and tunnel vision eyes are permanently attached to their Talmud Visions jew-tube NFL Stupid Bowl children’s level entertainment – this nation is only one Draconian Federal edict away from total slavery back to the ‘Dark Ages’ of history.

The Obongo Demoncraps will enact a ‘law’ under some false flag ‘ national crisis’ – or martial law edict that will empower his Chris Kyle mentality psychopathic thugs to do a door to door gun grab assisted by our brain-dead jew trained military ( read the 29 Palms survey of Marine treason) and life as we know it will be GONE FOREVER! It is NOT a matter of ‘if’ but of ‘when’. We have become such ignorant drone mentality feeders that most of us will simply comply as long as our Giant screen Talmud Vision TVs and our NFL Stupid Bowl heroes are still allowed.

We are one of the few people on Earth – that if asked by our Govt to dig our children’s graves – we will ask our occupiers to please hand us a shovel. The deafening silence of parents to protest the outrage of these jews created insane endless serial wars against innocent sovereign nations – to send their children to die and to murder millions of defenseless women and children ( over 500/per day) is mute testimony to our moral impotence and criminal stupidity.

Who is to blame? Probably the vast majority of people here who have become ‘feeder’ mentality drones – fat lazy – indifferent – irresponsible – uneducated – slovenly – servile – permanent state of denial – criminally ignorant – pleasure seeking- materialistic – immature – impotent – brain-dead – plant like – money worshiping – violence loving – bond-servants of the jews who occupy us for their amusement.

Had we ‘replaced the nail in the horseshoe when it SHOULD Have been done – perhaps we would still be a Republic of free industrious moral decent people. The Founding Fathers possessed a quality which has today become a ‘dirty word’ – WISDOM! When was the last time you hear an American President utter any words of Wisdom to our people – or GENUINE SINCERE concern for our nation’s welfare? Perhaps JFK – but the jew had him murdered.

Let me illustrate just how close we came to an UNDENIABLE logical fate as ending up as slaves to jew created communism years ago! I am going to PROVE this to you – IF you can follow the logic of wisdom and lessons of history.

We know from the past – that there is a high probability of certain consequences happening from neglecting to address certain issues that will ultimately change history.

MY conclusions are based upon these relevancies and what WOULD most certainly happen – should these events had NOT taken place ( e.g. – had the missing nail not been fixed). Or in my example below – what if the ‘nail’ HAD been fixed and the shoe not failed etc etc

Perhaps you may wish to re-read Dr. Franklin’s wisdom as noted in the first paragraph of my post before reading my analogy of a consequence of disastrous and monumental proportion.

Lets turn the history clock back to Weimar Germany ,circa 1933. The nation has been devastated from years of a severe depression caused by the insane postwar treatment of the German people by barbaric sanctions imposed by the England France and the US. The government is unstable and paralyzed by years of depression and infiltration by communist jews who see the time is ripe to overthrow the government.

For the US, 1933 is truly a date of infamy as the womanizing lying war-mongering deceitful racist corrupt treasonous self- proclaimed communist – FDR is elect President by criminally ignorant mobs during a harsh depression – NOTHING like what the German people suffered – but bad enough.

Back to Germany. Then ,Chancellor Paul Hindenburg – seeing that here is no way out to save Germany – sees a ray of hope in a man who has gained increasing public approval from a people who had lost all hope. That man was Adolph Hitler – a previously unknown decorated WWI veteran frustrated at seeing the injustices to his country and people.

To save Germany from the horrors of a communist takeover – such as happened in Christian Russia – Hindenburg appoints Hitler as Chancellor. Later we will see that this decision was what saved not only Germany – but all of Europe from enslavement by Stalin’s gangsters.

This move put the communists in a panic so as to make them make their move to take over earlier than planned. A month after Hitler gained his position – a Communist jew terrorist named Marinus Vander Lubbe set fire to the German Parliament building. He was caught by police and emergency decrees were issued to round up all of the jew communist traitor leaders. Their plot to create a civil war and take over the government fails.

What happened then was that Hitler unquestionably saved his country from a ‘Red’ takeover by the jews. Those are historic facts that cannot be refuted.

NOW let us look at WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF Hindenburg had either delayed his decision or refused completely to allow Hitler to save the German people ( virtually all Christian) from becoming another slave state of the Godless jew dominated Soviets.

The communists would have succeeded in their coup attempt. All resistance would have been crushed ( remember? Germany was left defenseless by the’ allies.) Tens of millions of Christian Germans would have been slaughtered and or led off to Siberian gulags as the Soviet Reds swarmed in for the kill as they did in Berlin – murdering and gang raping raping hundreds of thousands of helpless Christian civilians.

All the German scientists who later worked for the US space and advanced weapons projects like Werner Von Braun – would be forced to work for the Soviets. The Soviets would had the bomb earlier even with out the aid of American jew traitors – the Rosenbergs.

There would THEN be NO ONE to stand in the way of Soviet jew communist aggression in Europe as they take over country after country as they did AFTER the end of WWII – only THIS Time they have a head start of over a decade with an undamaged army.

The USA is still bogged down in a huge depression and SELF ADMITTED COMMUNIST TRAITOR to our Constitution – FDR – will be RE- ELECTED THREE TERMS by the same morons who placed this degenerate filthy reptile in power to begin with!!

Europe now falls to the communists COMPLETELY including France and England. Since all of Europe would then be under Soviet control – there is no way that the US – EVEN IF THEY WANTED to help – could have a foot hold in Europe. Besides – communist FDR always considered Stalin his buddy. Jew Eisenhower also was VERY VERY chummy with high ranking Soviet butchers and loved to party with Stalin ( incidentally – this can be verified on the net, )

Point is – why would we want to go to war with our ‘good friends the Soviets – since jew propaganda ( Hollywood films – Walter Durante – and of course our own President and his jew dominated cabinet tirelessly portrayed them as allies.

As years go by and the Soviets become more and more aggressive with hard core Marxist leaders like Stalin and Khrushchev the inevitable had to happen. A showdown between the USA and Red China and Red Cuba Red USSR and of course NOW a Red Europe! NO European country would have been able to withstand the Soviet hordes.

Note: Even though Germany lost the war – Their crippling blows to Soviet military during Operation Barbarossa set back the Soviet military machine long enough to delay their imperialist Ambitions in Europe from a complete takeover.

I believe that an analysis of these hypothetical circumstances by the best minds of prominent historians and Intelligence analysts would have to conclude that we would eventually face total destruction or become part of the Soviet ‘evil empire’ or some similar harsh concessions so as to effectively make us a slave State.

Effectually, Hitler’s quick action to foil the Communist coup – saved countless millions of lives in Europe and VERY PROBABLY the security of our own country years later. For those of you who can still think ‘outside the box’ – and not sharing a brain – you few will get it.

However – if Hitler HAD defeated the filthy jew dominated criminal animals of Stalin’s gangster animals – the USA would more than likely be an economic paradise of moral decent educated prosperous happy people today. I defy ANYONE to disprove to any substantial degree the logical consequences of what would have most certainly happened. Once again – well educated open minded perceptive analytical minds WILL see the truth of it.

Hitler was the most slandered lied about world leader in HISTORY He loved the children – was kind to animals – had no vices and courageously dedicated his life to his people and his country – qualities I have seldom if ever witnessed in the Presidents of my own country since I was a child. George Patton stated that we fought the wrong people and countless intelligent well educated decent people worldwide have come to the same conclusion.

Hitler and the German people were framed by jew lies! Now these insane mendacities are coming to light one by one. The TRUTH is favored by God. The TRUTH is inviolate. The TRUTH will always triumph over deceit lies and deception and I will keep revealing it. I am sick to death of jew lies and jew liars. lying is hard-wired into their black hearts.

Those of you who STILL have any doubt as to the horrid wickedness and endless hatred of jews for anything pure decent good and innocent for thousands of years – READ YOUR BIBLE! There is an old saying when mud slinging gets ridiculously rampant.


Get it yet? The Devil is the ESSENCE of MURDER and LIES – and Christ just stated that the jews WILL do these same horrid wicked MURDERS and LIES because they worship him.

So lets get this straight! It is REAL simple WHO are you going to believe is lying? JESUS? or the JEWS?

ALL of the filth and slander about him has been instigated by the world’s most prolific liars the stinking jews who murdered Christ. Just before Jesus was murder by these demonic evil Satanic jews – He stated in PLAIN COMPREHENSIVE language – their demonic nature as a people and especially the fact of their reputation as prolific LIARS.

These false so-called bloodthirsty war-mongering Baptists today and their blasphemous oxymronic insane Christian/Zionist garbage is the ultimate blasphemy against God and His words. Scripture said it clearly. “you can not serve two masters at the same time” You cannot serve Satan/Zionists – AND Christ.

To reveal just how putrid slimy and evil these BaptDUHS bastards here is the ugly truth:

BaptDUHS are MORE concerned with offending the children of Satan – than MOCKING THE LORD!

Let me repeat that UGLY TRUTH


To find out WHY this other outcome to our future could accurately be concluded with reasonable accuracy – read my research in ‘WHAT IF THE GERMANS – THEN A CHRISTIAN NATION HAD PREVAILED OVER THE JEW DRIVEN ALLIES’.

My name is Joe Cortina. I was a 60s Green Beret commander and a representative for IBM as well as a scientist for Honeywell Aerospace in Florida. I later became President of my own manufacturing company. I have two sons and 2 granddaughters who are the reason for my dedication to expose the threats to the freedoms I hope to see them enjoy as I did many decades ago when America was still a Christian-based sovereign nation free of Zionist influence.

Book Of John Chapter 8 – as Christ damns the Jews ( and NOT JUST THE HIGH PRIESTS AND Pharisees – see notes below)

” Ye do the deeds of your father (the devil). If God were your father. ye would love me; for I proceed forth and came from God: neither came I of myself, but He sent me.”

” Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie – he speaketh of his own; ( the Jews) for he is a liar, and the father of it”

“That this SATANIC FATHERHOOD cannot be limited to the Pharisees is MADE CLEAR in 1 John 3;8-10″

Matthew 23:15″ Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.

“You serpents, you generation of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell?” (Jesus – to the Jews; in Matthew 23:33)

“My opinion of Christian Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful idiots we can get right now.” — Benyamin Netanyahu, at the time a former IsraHELL prime minister

“There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people”

“Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.” — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002. (Widely reported, see here)

Israel, America’s albatross



    Unless you understand why Jesus of Nazareth gave this warning, you will NEVER understand why Talmudic Jews hate him so much:

    “Beware the leaven of the Pharisees……………….” (Matthew 16:6)

    If you study Matthew ch 15, ch 19 & ch 23 plus John 8 you will begin to understand that Jesus has a major problem with the Oral Tradition aka The Traditions of the Elders (of Zion), which we have today in published form as the Jewish Babylonian Talmud (35vols).

    It is a well known ploy, that if you have a problem with someone in an organization, you promote them up & out of the way. Talmudic Jews had a major problem with Jesus of Nazareth & his teachings on the Oral Tradition, so they got one of their numbers to “convert” & distort the Message of Jesus of Nazareth (Galatians ch 1 & 2; 2 Corinthians ch 11). Jesus of Nazareth chose 12 Apostles & none of them were Saul of Tarsus! Even when Judas was to be replaced, he wasn’t chosen to take his place. Saul of Tarsus was a Pharisee & a false prophet & opened the door for Talmudic Jews to enter the Church & destroy it (Romans ch 11, ch 12 & ch 13.

    And here is the verse where Jesus of Nazareth is promoted out of the way, so that the Pharisee can take over the Church & preach the “gospel” which has caused so much trouble for true followers of Jesus.

    2 Corinthians 5:16
    Amplified Bible (AMP)
    16 Consequently, from now on we estimate and regard no one from a [purely] human point of view [in terms of natural standards of value]. [No] even though we once did estimate Christ from a human viewpoint and as a man, yet now [we have such knowledge of Him that] we know Him no longer [in terms of the flesh].

    The result?

    Jesus is promoted to Godhood & his Message is lost sight of, because of all the arguments concerning the Deity of Christ. This suited the Talmudic Jews in the Church, because they were masters of speculation and got stupid Christians arguing about things, instead of preaching & teaching the Message of Jesus, which was summed up in these 2 Commandments:
    Matthew 22:36-40
    36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?”
    37 Jesus said unto him, “‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.’
    38 This is the first and great commandment.
    39 And the second is like unto it: ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.’
    40 On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”

    Matthew 19:13-24
    To Enter God’s Kingdom
    13-15 One day children were brought to Jesus in the hope that he would lay hands on them and pray over them. The disciples shooed them off. But Jesus intervened: “Let the children alone, don’t prevent them from coming to me. God’s kingdom is made up of people like these.” After laying hands on them, he left.
    16 Another day, a man stopped Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”
    17 Jesus said, “Why do you question me about what’s good? God is the One who is good. If you want to enter the life of God, just do what he tells you.”
    18-19 The man asked, “What in particular?”
    Jesus said, “Don’t murder, don’t commit adultery, don’t steal, don’t lie, honor your father and mother, and love your neighbor as you do yourself.”
    20 The young man said, “I’ve done all that. What’s left?”
    21 “If you want to give it all you’ve got,” Jesus replied, “go sell your possessions; give everything to the poor. All your wealth will then be in heaven. Then come follow me.”
    22 That was the last thing the young man expected to hear. And so, crestfallen, he walked away. He was holding on tight to a lot of things, and he couldn’t bear to let go.
    23-24 As he watched him go, Jesus told his disciples, “Do you have any idea how difficult it is for the rich to enter God’s kingdom? Let me tell you, it’s easier to gallop a camel through a needle’s eye than for the rich to enter God’s kingdom.”

    This was the Message that Jesus preached & taught his Disciples, but his Message was hijacked & Romanism was the result!

    So let us look at the Oral Tradition & see why Jesus CONDEMNED it:


    Although Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Leviticus. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that “unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest,” since then “you will find no woman eligible … .” (from the Talmud book of Yebamoth, Folios 59a-59b)
    Leviticus 20:16
    16 And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
    Leviticus 21:7
    7 They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane; neither shall they take a woman put away from her husband: for he is holy unto his God.
    Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth
    Folio 59b
    — This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar.4 If [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 — R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of ‘previous carnal intercourse’ may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be’ulah10 she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be’ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded14 by a splinter! No, said R. Zera,15 in respect of a minor who made a declaration of refusal.16
    R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest.17 Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being,18 though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning,19 is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest.20
    When R. Dimi came21 he related: It once happened at Haitalu22 that while a young woman was sweeping the floor23 a village dog24 covered her from the rear,25 and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High Priest in the days of Rabbi?26 — Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest.
    Raba of Parzakaia27 said to R. Ashi: Whence is derived the following statement which the Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse? — It is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog, 28 and yet we learned that the hire of a dog29 and the price of a harlot30 are permitted31 because it is said, Even both these,28 two only but not four.
    Our Rabbis taught: [A High Priest] shall not marry the woman he himself has outraged or seduced.32 If, however, he married her, the marriage is valid.33 He shall not marry a woman whom another man has outraged or seduced. If he did marry her, the child, said R. Eliezer b. Jacob, is profaned:34 but the Sages said: The child is legitimate.35
    ‘If, however, he married her, the marriage is valid’. Said R. Huna in the name of Rab: But he must put her aside by a letter of divorce. What, then, [is the explanation] of the statement ‘If, however, he married her, the marriage is valid’? — R. Aha b. Jacob replied: It was meant to imply
    Original footnotes renumbered.
    1. The Baraitha cited by Raba.
    2. Lit., ‘this, according to whom’?
    3. Cf. supra p. 395, n. 7.
    4. Cf. supra p. 395, n. 10.
    5. As a reason for prohibition.
    6. Who is forbidden not only to a High Priest but also to a common priest (v. Lev. XXI, 7). Why, then, did Rab refer to a High Priest only?
    7. Infra 61b, 76a, Sanh. 51a, Tem. 30a.
    8. Rab’s reason of ‘previous carnal intercourse’ was necessary.
    9. A term which is not applicable to bestial intercourse. V. infra.
    10. [H] one who had experienced carnal intercourse.
    11. Presumably because her act cannot be regarded as ‘sexual intercourse’.
    12. V. supra p. 394, n. 8. As in her case marriage with a High Priest is forbidden (v. our Mishnah), though she is no harlot, so also in the case of bestial intercourse.
    13. I.e., if injury to the anus is to be subject to the same restrictions as injury to the hymen.
    14. Cf. supra p. 394, n. 8.
    15. Rab’s reason of ‘previous carnal intercourse’ was necessary.
    16. Mema’eneth, v. Glos. Unnatural intercourse with her by her husband places the minor in the status of be’ulah (v. Glos.) but not in that of harlot, while her refusal to live with him does not give her the status of divorcee or widow but that of mema’eneth. Hence the necessity for Rab’s statement that such a minor also is forbidden to marry a High Priest.
    17. Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either.
    18. A beast.
    19. If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning.
    20. In the absence of witnesses and warning.
    21. From Palestine to Babylon.
    22. [Babylonian form for Aitalu, modern Aiterun N.W. of Kadesh, v, S. Klein, Beitrage p. 47].
    23. Lit., ‘house’.
    24. Or ‘big hunting dog’ (Rashi), ‘ferocious dog’ (Jast.), ‘small wild dog’ (Aruk).
    25. A case of unnatural intercourse.
    26. Judah ha-nasi (the Prince or Patriarch) I, who flourished 170-217 C.E., above a hundred years after the destruction of the second Temple.
    27. So Bomberg ed.; MS.M., ‘Parazika’ (cf. Golds.); Cur. edd., ‘Parkin’.
    28. Deut. XXIII, 19.
    29. The beast which a harlot receives for her intercourse with a dog.
    30. A beast received as the price of a harlot who has been sold.
    31. To be consecrated to the altar.
    32. Cf. Lev. XXI, 14: But a virgin … shall he take, i.e., she must be a virgin at the time he marries her.
    33. Lit., ‘he is married’.
    34. Halal, v. Glos.
    35. He is not subject to any disabilities, religious or civil,
    Rulings of the “sages” follow: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest — even a High Priest.” Unless specifically warned in advance and the act seen by two witnesses, she is acceptable also. If she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, and suitable. For, “The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such as intercourse either.”
    This alone gives a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ’s denunciations about their making God’s commandments of none effect by their Tradition. (Matthew 15:6)
    Matthew 15:6
    6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

    (Lit., ‘she who refuses’); a woman who exercises the right of mi’un, q.v.

    (Lit., ‘refusal’); a declaration by a fatherless girl who has been married off by her mother or brothers under age, that she does not wish to live with her husband. Such a declaration made by her in the presence of a Beth din secures her freedom without the requirement of a Get.

    (Lit., ‘house of law or judgment’); a gathering of three or more learned men acting as a Jewish court of law.
    A deed or legal document; when used without further specification denotes generally a writ of divorce.
    pl. minim, (Lit., ‘kind’, ‘species’); (a) a heretic, esp. (b) a member of the sect of the early Jewish Christians.

    Heresy, the belief in more than one Power, especially Judeo-Christianity.
    Sanhedrin 90b, note 17].
    Term used generally as a designation for Judeo-Christians. Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, pp. 232-4, conjectures that this discussion took place in Rome, whither R. Gamaliel journeyed in 95 C.E., since this is followed by ‘The Romans asked R. Joshua.’ He maintains that both sides accepted the fact of resurrection of the dead, the dispute being whether it is intimated in the Torah. The importance of the debate lay in the fact that the Christians maintained that the resurrection of the dead was consequent upon the resurrection of Christ this doctrine of course would be weakened if it could be shown that resurrection was already taught in the Torah.
    Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Yebamoth
    Folio 63a
    R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh?13 This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.
    2. Isa. LVIII, 9. This refers to the preceding text: If then thou seest the naked, that thou cover him (ibid. 7), i.e., helping the poor at the hour of his need; and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh (ibid.) implies benefiting relatives including the marriage of a sister’s daughter and loving one’s neighbours who are regarded as relatives.
    3. The words in the mnemonic correspond to terms outstanding in the respective statements of R. Eleazar, that follow.
    4. Gen. V, 2. Adam = man. Only when the male and female were united were they called Adam.
    5. Ps. CXV, 16, emphasis on man and earth.
    6. Gen. II, 18.
    7. [H], ‘help’.
    8. [H], meet for him may also be rendered ‘against him’.
    9. [H] (rt. [H], ‘to strike’).
    10. [H] meet for him.
    11. Gen. II, 18.
    12. Obviously not. His wife grinds the wheat and spins the flax.
    13. Gen. II, 23, emphasis on This is now.

    When Jesus of Nazareth accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law. (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.
    References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.
    The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.
    Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” (3)
    In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia: “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” (4)

    It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar (‘sin’) was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]
    As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.
    But with expulsion of the Jews [‘Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim’] in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
    Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.

    What exactly did these sages say?
    The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” (See, “Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell”) Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)
    A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

    In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the ‘precursors’ of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]
    R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanh. 55b)
    “A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)
    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)
    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)
    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)
    The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”
    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.
    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”

    The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” (10)
    The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)
    In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.
    Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

    Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism . This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
    “There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.”
    The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” (12)
    These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”
    In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” (13) This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”
    The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

    Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
    The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known [!!!]. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.
    Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:
    “There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against the Pharisees, who represented the finest traditions of their people and of human morals.” (14)

    “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.” (Matthew 23:27, 28.)
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.
    9 Sanhedrin 55a.
    10 Kethuboth 11a.
    11 Kethuboth 11b.
    12 Yebamoth 60b.
    13 Sanhedrin 76b.
    14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.


    Screenwriter and director, Billy Wilder, has had an enormous impact on the public, as substantiated by his numerous Oscars and other film awards. Responsible for famous films like Hold Back the Dawn, Five Graves to Cairo, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard, Stalag 17, Sabrina and The Apartment, Wilder’s cinema successes were granted him as he was just another pawn who was utilized with satanic acumen to help abolish society’s established code of ethics. His own authorized biographer who worked closely with him, Maurice Zolotow, wrote:
    “Of course, I did not know what I was getting into when I had started this. It became, as all such journeys have become, a journey to find out the secret springs of this most devious and perverse of Hollywood’s personalities.”
    Wilder loved to transport the viewer into the depravity of his own heart and did this by tricking the censors who sought to enforce the old Hollywood Production Code of Hollywood’s “Golden Age.” Wilder recalls, “We had to operate cunningly to outwit the censors and this made us write more subtly.” What subtleties did he scatter throughout his films? Perversion. In his movie, The Major and the Minor, Wilder admits that the motif was child sexuality, stating:
    “Ray Milland falls in love with Ginger as a twelve year old child. We had here the first American movie about pedophilia. The Major is sexually aroused by her. He can’t help himself. I was worried that audiences would be shocked by this story, but it seems that they were not.”

    This goes to show that if a story is entertaining and “cute,” it can bypass the normal reaction to such filth and translate into apathetic disregard on the slippery slope of corruption. Where did this movie minister of perversion receive his material? Wilder was given his creative material by another supernatural force. In addition to stating that he is “demonically possessed and slightly crazed,” Zolotow reports of Wilder:

    “He could not stop his creative machinery from functioning. He was enslaved by his art…One sometimes felt as if one were moved by powerful invisible forces. I forgot to tell you that Wilder never starts a new screenplay without typing two words on the first page: Cum Deo (‘With God’). He has a pantheistic feeling about the universe.”
    Demon possession leads many from the truths of God to the pantheistic lies of the New Age movement because Satan uses those who will serve him most faithfully in preparing humanity to embrace him as the god of this world. Wilder’s responses upon completion of his show make it readily apparent which god he aligned himself with. Scientologist screenwriter of the Sound of Music, Ernest Lehman, recalls:

    “He looked at the heavens and screeched F— you!” It was…a victory cry, as if he were calling out to God and saying, ‘I completed this picture despite everything you did to make me surrender.'”

    Dr. Lycurgus Starkey rightly announced on the NBC network: “His movies have overturned all the sexual mores, glorified promiscuity, glamorized prostitution and elevated adultery to a virtue.” Dr. Starkey was prophetically right in predicting the social effect and outcome of Wilder’s films that we currently face in our day. The atheist author of communism, Karl Marx, explains the reasons why this is so:

    “The ideas of the ruling class are, in every age, the ruling ideas: i.e., the class which is the dominant material force in society is at the same time its dominant intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production.”

    The gross immorality in Hollywood that makes its way on the screen and thus influences the masses reflects the lives of those who operate within it. An intimate friend of the late Steve McQueen related:

    “He’d kill for a part in a movie…he’d suck anyone’s [expletive]…he’d get f—– or f— anyone who’d get him a part in a show…then he’d wish-he’d pray- that person would have a heart attack or a stroke and die, and then there would be no way for anyone to know how McQueen had got the part.”

    This disgusting ambition is what keeps the infamous casting couch warm and desirous hopeful actors willing. Hollywood insider, Phyllis Diller, clarifies this fact:

    “The casting couch is the name of the game in Hollywood. I know there are stars, especially women, who have made a career from sexual favors.”

    Would you invite a person whom you knew to be ethically bankrupt and an absolute moral degenerate into your home to influentially instruct your wife, your husband, and your children or loved ones? These are the very ones that America invites into their home every night via the television to submissively share their lives with.
    Biblically condemned spiritual conundrums regularly occur in Hollywood. Faye Dunaway said that the ghost of Joan Crawford is haunting her. Actress Jean Seberg believed that her “devils” kept her from ever being free. She stated:
    “The devils will stop that sort of stuff in a second. They ride right here. (Touching her collar bone with her fingers) Sitting here and here. There’s one on each side…these are both unfriendly influences. They tell me to run my car into other cars, or drive off a cliff.”

    A friend later reflected on her life and pin pointed the cause as the “acting classes at Columbia Studios…[which] had the power to influence Jean’s devils.” Like countless others in the Hollywood movie star system, this lead to psychiatric hospitals and suicide. Actor Sal Mineo was in regular contact with psychics and spoke of the “vibrations” of James Dean’s spirit that haunted him, stating, “I’ve got to get him off my back because I don’t want to join him down there.” Mineo was murdered under mysterious circumstances. Is fame worth the extorted fees that Satan demands of his servants of the silver screen?

    As Alan Alda declared:

    “There’s plenty of money to be had…But you also lose your soul.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s